and gun grabbers(but I repeat myself).....
What, exactly, do you want to propose for "Common sense gun laws" that (short of outlawing all firearms and/or confiscation ) would have prevented these jihadi psychos from doing what they did?
They were able to perpetrate their massacre in California, one of the states where gun laws are fairly restrictive.
What, exactly, would more laws have done to stop them from doing what they did?
Please, explain. Be specific.
1 comment:
I think I'd make one small change to your question. I'd substitute including for the word "short of". I think it's apparent that the level of planning and preparation would have allowed them to procure weapons even in the event of confiscation.
Other than that, spot on!
Post a Comment