Yeah, a mural painted showing a man (supposedly G. Zimmerman) shooting a black teen (representing Trayvon Martin) IN THE BACK! oughta help dispel racial tensions.
It is, of course, designed to inflame racial tensions. The depiction in the mural doesn't even come close to what really happened that night. Not that many people who never bothered to find out the facts will ever bother to learn that this is a poor representation of relaity.
Couple of questions: Who commissioned the artist's work? WHO PAID FOR IT?
Who arranged for the artist to take the commission?
Why did she paint such an inflammatory mural?
Who benefits from increased tensions?