So some executive orders that were enacted illegally cannot be undone by a second executive order......
Or at least that is what the courts said today.
Seems that a Clinton appointed judge says that an Executive order that was, on it's face, illegal (But written and signed by a Democrat) cannot be undone by a legally enacted Executive order by a Republican....
So somehow, Executive orders become law if they are in place long enough....IF done by Democrat. Why do we allow this? This wasn't LAW, enacted by the legislature it was a proclamation. Why do we allow ANY president to use executive orders this way?
Or at least that is what the courts said today.
Seems that a Clinton appointed judge says that an Executive order that was, on it's face, illegal (But written and signed by a Democrat) cannot be undone by a legally enacted Executive order by a Republican....
So somehow, Executive orders become law if they are in place long enough....IF done by Democrat. Why do we allow this? This wasn't LAW, enacted by the legislature it was a proclamation. Why do we allow ANY president to use executive orders this way?
No comments:
Post a Comment