Unlike Indiana, many states do not require an ID to vote. Generally each time they try to implement such a rule, they get slammed by lawsuits.
Most of the time the argument against is that this somehow inconveniences or disenfranchises the minority voter....Despite the fact that anyone who works (legally), has a bank account, cashes a check, gets government assistance or ever needs to go into a government building must have an ID document issued by the state to do so.
But to vote? Oh, No, that'd be an inconvenience and a hardship to require an ID.
But, believe it or not, the 9th (yeah, that one) Court of Appeals finds that there is no evidence of the undue hardship or burden for anyone, especially minority voters.
We are winning. Slowly, and with a great struggle, but we are winning. This is precedent setting.
I guess that the DNC will have to find another way to cheat soon.
From earlier this shift: AD:“Howdy, Mercy General, this is AD on Borg Cube 564. We’re five minutes out with Freda Freq[...]
1 day ago