If true:
Gun used in Paris Attacks was a Fast and Furious gun...came from Phoenix gun store.....
So, if this is true....a gun from the US was smuggled into France....Where guns are illegal.
Odd, just like Heroin or Cocaine, only the countries have changed...
I would have thought it would have come from Algiers or Syria.....Less travel. Likely easier to get it across a border than through customs.
Unless, of course, you think that Barry had it planned to stimulate gun control and prevent such "Easy Access To Guns" and such.
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
Not yet dismissed:
One wonders why he is still a judge?
I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, day, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation (across the centuries—well, just a little more than two centuries, and of course less for many of the amendments). Eighteenth-century guys, however smart, could not foresee the culture, technology, etc., of the 21st century. Which means that the original Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the post–Civil War amendments (including the 14th), do not speak to today. David Strauss is right: The Supreme Court treats the Constitution like it is authorizing the court to create a common law of constitutional law, based on current concerns, not what those 18th-century guys were worrying about.
Why hasn't he been dismissed? (or shot for abandoning his oath...?)
From Wikipedia:
In the United States, federal judges are required to take two oaths. The first oath is this:
I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as (office) under the Constitution and laws of the United States. [So help me God.][74]
The second is the same oath that members of Congress take:
I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. [So help me God.][73]
Federal statute specifically says that the latter oath "does not affect other oaths required by law."[75]
I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, day, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation (across the centuries—well, just a little more than two centuries, and of course less for many of the amendments). Eighteenth-century guys, however smart, could not foresee the culture, technology, etc., of the 21st century. Which means that the original Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the post–Civil War amendments (including the 14th), do not speak to today. David Strauss is right: The Supreme Court treats the Constitution like it is authorizing the court to create a common law of constitutional law, based on current concerns, not what those 18th-century guys were worrying about.
Why hasn't he been dismissed? (or shot for abandoning his oath...?)
From Wikipedia:
In the United States, federal judges are required to take two oaths. The first oath is this:
I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as (office) under the Constitution and laws of the United States. [So help me God.][74]
The second is the same oath that members of Congress take:
I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. [So help me God.][73]
Federal statute specifically says that the latter oath "does not affect other oaths required by law."[75]
Monday, June 27, 2016
Saturday, June 25, 2016
Do you know how to figure out if someone is a vegetarian?
(or a Vegan?)
You don't have to figure it out.
They will tell you themselves within 5 minutes of meeting you.
You don't have to figure it out.
They will tell you themselves within 5 minutes of meeting you.
AAANDDD a big "FUCK YOU"
Civil liberties and exercise thereof.
So if you are considered dangerous enough that when placed on the no fly list (or terrorist watch list) that you should not be able to fly, or, as the Democrats are pushing, not buy able to buy a firearm....
Then shouldn't inclusion of the No Fly List preclude you from serving as a leader of the country?
I mean, you could do more damage in Congress than you could with a firearm and a few magazines....
Why should you not be able to buy a firearm if the TSA has you on one of it's lists?
Because Orlando.
Where the perpetrator wasn't on the No fly list.
But gun control. So there.
Then shouldn't inclusion of the No Fly List preclude you from serving as a leader of the country?
I mean, you could do more damage in Congress than you could with a firearm and a few magazines....
Why should you not be able to buy a firearm if the TSA has you on one of it's lists?
Because Orlando.
Where the perpetrator wasn't on the No fly list.
But gun control. So there.
Friday, June 24, 2016
OUT!
So the Brits (as a country) chose to leave the EU.
Smart move, IMO.
But what happened to the Independent spirit of Scotland?
At least the Brits don't have to spend their wealth to prop up Greece and other countries......And they won't be forced to accept other peoples immigrants without limi. (and IMO, it was border control that put the decision over the top...).
Britain has taken a step towards independence. A MAJOR step toward self governance once more.
Perhaps there is hope for the British, after all.
I must say I expected a bit of vote manipulation to make the verdict go the other way.....
Smart move, IMO.
But what happened to the Independent spirit of Scotland?
At least the Brits don't have to spend their wealth to prop up Greece and other countries......And they won't be forced to accept other peoples immigrants without limi. (and IMO, it was border control that put the decision over the top...).
Britain has taken a step towards independence. A MAJOR step toward self governance once more.
Perhaps there is hope for the British, after all.
I must say I expected a bit of vote manipulation to make the verdict go the other way.....
Thursday, June 23, 2016
Proving they are not fit to govern
Perhaps we DO need new gun control legislation.
Perhaps. (Probably not, but let us be open minded here)
But such legislation, such far reaching rules, that will affect millions of people, which may make billions of dollars of firearms now legally owned by people suddenly illegal, should be thought through carefully.
Insisting that such far reaching legislation with such provisions as limiting gun ownership (or purchases) by those on a non-vetted list such as No Fly or Terrorist Watch, that would infringe upon the freedom of our citizens be rushed, without any debate, without any review, with no real planning, is foolish.
Perhaps we do need such laws. (I don't think so) But only after much consideration. Not in reaction.
But these games, they play are stupid and childish. Worse, they show that they think their constituents are stupid. These antics show the contempt they have for our system of government and the people who elected them to be their representatives. If they REALLY care about gun violence and feel that We Must Do Something, then why weren't they Doing Something the week or month BEFORE the Orlando murders? Where was their legislation then? Where was their debate then? Where was their outrage then? These 49 murders, while tragic, are a rounding error in the daily deaths in our country. Tragic, yes, But statistically insignificant in the grand schem f deaths in our cities.
If they really cared about fixing the issues, they would be fixing them, rather than reacting to event and being all emotional and such.
'Cause real leaders would't just play such games.
Perhaps. (Probably not, but let us be open minded here)
But such legislation, such far reaching rules, that will affect millions of people, which may make billions of dollars of firearms now legally owned by people suddenly illegal, should be thought through carefully.
Insisting that such far reaching legislation with such provisions as limiting gun ownership (or purchases) by those on a non-vetted list such as No Fly or Terrorist Watch, that would infringe upon the freedom of our citizens be rushed, without any debate, without any review, with no real planning, is foolish.
Perhaps we do need such laws. (I don't think so) But only after much consideration. Not in reaction.
But these games, they play are stupid and childish. Worse, they show that they think their constituents are stupid. These antics show the contempt they have for our system of government and the people who elected them to be their representatives. If they REALLY care about gun violence and feel that We Must Do Something, then why weren't they Doing Something the week or month BEFORE the Orlando murders? Where was their legislation then? Where was their debate then? Where was their outrage then? These 49 murders, while tragic, are a rounding error in the daily deaths in our country. Tragic, yes, But statistically insignificant in the grand schem f deaths in our cities.
If they really cared about fixing the issues, they would be fixing them, rather than reacting to event and being all emotional and such.
'Cause real leaders would't just play such games.
Wednesday, June 22, 2016
Bummr
Remember the incident with the mis-ordered 1911 I had discussed on my Range Day post?
Yeah, Gander Mountain just Emailed me.....the day the pistol was supposed to arrive:
"Sorry, we are cancelling your order because we don't have one and don't know when we will get any more."
Remember us for your future firearm needs....
Which sucks, because 34% discount....
Plus free shipping.
Or not, as the case may be.
I am exploring my options at this time.
Yeah, Gander Mountain just Emailed me.....the day the pistol was supposed to arrive:
"Sorry, we are cancelling your order because we don't have one and don't know when we will get any more."
Remember us for your future firearm needs....
Which sucks, because 34% discount....
Plus free shipping.
Or not, as the case may be.
I am exploring my options at this time.
Monday, June 20, 2016
Hiding the truth
So the DOJ censored/edited the 911 call from Omar Matteen to hide any reference to islam?
Wonder who ordered that?
I am not certain that the attack in Orlando was motivated solely by ideology, but still....Trying to hide what we already were aware of?
This action shows how arrogant the Obama minions are, and how stupid they think the public is (I guess, since he got re-elected he may not be entirely wrong there, but still)
One wonders why he tries to hide the identities of these people? Is he Muslim and is simply practicing taqiyya...? Trying to keep the rest of the citizens from rising in outrage?
ETA: seems that they have reversed the stance, and have released the unedited/uncensored tapes.
Pretty stupid to even try, really. Might have gotten away with that 30 years ago, but today? Not a chance. I guess he thought that the News Media would follow along.
Wonder who ordered that?
I am not certain that the attack in Orlando was motivated solely by ideology, but still....Trying to hide what we already were aware of?
This action shows how arrogant the Obama minions are, and how stupid they think the public is (I guess, since he got re-elected he may not be entirely wrong there, but still)
One wonders why he tries to hide the identities of these people? Is he Muslim and is simply practicing taqiyya...? Trying to keep the rest of the citizens from rising in outrage?
ETA: seems that they have reversed the stance, and have released the unedited/uncensored tapes.
Pretty stupid to even try, really. Might have gotten away with that 30 years ago, but today? Not a chance. I guess he thought that the News Media would follow along.
Truth:
“You don’t have a constitutional right to come to America."
About time someone in Government realized this.
I am the descendant of immigrants. They came, they assimilated, they loved this country over the one they left. They made this country their own, and they loved it for the opportunities it offered and the freedoms it bestowed upon them. They made a life here, and they chose to stay and they chose to be CITIZENS.
About time someone in Government realized this.
I am the descendant of immigrants. They came, they assimilated, they loved this country over the one they left. They made this country their own, and they loved it for the opportunities it offered and the freedoms it bestowed upon them. They made a life here, and they chose to stay and they chose to be CITIZENS.
Sunday, June 19, 2016
Suspicion is all it will take:
First, of course, they want to ban anyone on the no fly list. A list wherein you are added just because some bureaucrat says you belong on the list...based on unknown criteria.
With, effectively, no way off....and you won't know you are on until you are told that you can't fly. Might be a similar name. Maybe because you are a member of a club that someone else on the No Fly list belongs to....Maybe because you pissed off some TSA flunky one day. (No one really knows how you get on the list....)...AND THERE IS NO METHOD TO APPEAL YOUR BEING ON THE LIST unless you can get a senator to intervene.....
Then they want the Terror Watch list. Same thing, really. No one knows how you get on the list, and really no one knows they ARE on the list. And if you did discover that you were on the list, there is no way to appeal or have your listing reviewed.
Seems to me,. that if your right to fly is to be restricted, then you are too dangerous to be walking the streets. Same with the Terror Watch list. After the Paris Attacks, the authorities KNEW who to detain, question, and subsequently arrest. Those folks were already on the watch list....they just rounded 'em up. How many died, how many lives were destroyed or forever altered because those folks on the French Watch list were allowed to run around and do their dastardly deeds (or aid those who DID do the deeds)?
If you are truly a danger, enough that you are on the Watch list, or the No Fly list, you should be under arrest and detained by the Feds while they investigate to make their case.....Or you should be investigated and released. The criteria are either too lax or the criteria aren't being properly implemented in either case.
Here is the thing: If due to suspicion you are deemed dangerous enough to be denied a Constitutional right, then you should be JAILED for the goosd of socienty and your fellow citizens. If you aren't that dangerous, then no denial of rights should happen.
Now they want to restrict a Constitutional right based upon a list that is poorly vetted (if indeed, it is vetted at all).
And now, Senator Bob Casey wants to restrict your Constitutionally guaranteed Second Amendment rights because of "Hate Speech"? Not of conviction of Hate Speech, but SUSPICION of hate speech. (Sidebar here: How does "Hate Speech" laws reconcile with Free Speech? . When did an opinion or statement of belief become against the law? How do the two reconcile? And why aren't anti gunners who post those terrible tweets and missives (and wish me dead and such) in comments on HuffPo articles arrested and charged with Hate Speech? How about those muslims (and Presidential Preachers) who say "death to America!" (Is it because some hate speech is ok and other kinds are not? Who decides?)
Again though: Senator Casey wants to restrict your rights based on SUSPICION....not conviction....SUSPICION. What is next? At what point will we stop?
Much of what I write here could be, under some criteria, used as evidence of suspicion of hate speech/WrongThink....By someone who wants to point me out to suspend my rights.....and in their perfect world, I will never get my "Speedy Trial" either.....
And after me? You. Yep, you. You returned here many times, therefore you must agree with me.....Turn over your guns and other rights, Citizen.
With, effectively, no way off....and you won't know you are on until you are told that you can't fly. Might be a similar name. Maybe because you are a member of a club that someone else on the No Fly list belongs to....Maybe because you pissed off some TSA flunky one day. (No one really knows how you get on the list....)...AND THERE IS NO METHOD TO APPEAL YOUR BEING ON THE LIST unless you can get a senator to intervene.....
Then they want the Terror Watch list. Same thing, really. No one knows how you get on the list, and really no one knows they ARE on the list. And if you did discover that you were on the list, there is no way to appeal or have your listing reviewed.
Seems to me,. that if your right to fly is to be restricted, then you are too dangerous to be walking the streets. Same with the Terror Watch list. After the Paris Attacks, the authorities KNEW who to detain, question, and subsequently arrest. Those folks were already on the watch list....they just rounded 'em up. How many died, how many lives were destroyed or forever altered because those folks on the French Watch list were allowed to run around and do their dastardly deeds (or aid those who DID do the deeds)?
If you are truly a danger, enough that you are on the Watch list, or the No Fly list, you should be under arrest and detained by the Feds while they investigate to make their case.....Or you should be investigated and released. The criteria are either too lax or the criteria aren't being properly implemented in either case.
Here is the thing: If due to suspicion you are deemed dangerous enough to be denied a Constitutional right, then you should be JAILED for the goosd of socienty and your fellow citizens. If you aren't that dangerous, then no denial of rights should happen.
Now they want to restrict a Constitutional right based upon a list that is poorly vetted (if indeed, it is vetted at all).
And now, Senator Bob Casey wants to restrict your Constitutionally guaranteed Second Amendment rights because of "Hate Speech"? Not of conviction of Hate Speech, but SUSPICION of hate speech. (Sidebar here: How does "Hate Speech" laws reconcile with Free Speech? . When did an opinion or statement of belief become against the law? How do the two reconcile? And why aren't anti gunners who post those terrible tweets and missives (and wish me dead and such) in comments on HuffPo articles arrested and charged with Hate Speech? How about those muslims (and Presidential Preachers) who say "death to America!" (Is it because some hate speech is ok and other kinds are not? Who decides?)
Again though: Senator Casey wants to restrict your rights based on SUSPICION....not conviction....SUSPICION. What is next? At what point will we stop?
Much of what I write here could be, under some criteria, used as evidence of suspicion of hate speech/WrongThink....By someone who wants to point me out to suspend my rights.....and in their perfect world, I will never get my "Speedy Trial" either.....
And after me? You. Yep, you. You returned here many times, therefore you must agree with me.....Turn over your guns and other rights, Citizen.
Saturday, June 18, 2016
Range day Friday....good and bad.
So my younger brother brought my nephew to see me from Illinois, and we spent the afternoon at the range shooting rimfire.
He (nephew) has his maternal grandfathers Remington 511 "ScoreMaster" which I cleaned and lubed when it was given to him about a year ago (the thing hadn't had more than 100 rounds through it, and, aside from petrified gun oil and dust was, actually, in perfect condition) Has a tiny thin 4X scope on it, but in bright sunny conditions that works very well.
We called my other brother and my Dad for a range day. All had fun. 3 generations on a range. This is why we win. There is no equivalent "(Anti) range day" that can compete.
We poked a few holes in paper at 25, then 50, yards, rang the gongs at 50 yards. Then knocked over bowling pins at 50 yards (nephew really likes that).
His dad (my youngest brother) put a few hundred rounds through the Marlin lever action ,22 model 1897. I think I am gonna get him one for Christmas, if I can find one. Or a 39M.
Nephew liked the Savage bolt gun too, but not as much as grandad's rifle.
Of course, everyone likes the Non-Ruger 10-22 in Red/White/Blue. 2 lb trigger, Big 4-10 X 60 scope, What's not to like?
Dad shot his 9mm pistol, and we all shot his recently-found Springfield .22 single shot (no model number that I can find). It has extraction issues, but I am sure I can fix that. Clean, no rust, good trigger. Likely old as shit as there is no serial number that I can find.
I did put 25 rounds through the Para LDA with the new Kimber spring (the original Para spring is, of course, not available, and is now at over twice the recommended round count for replacement...., and Remington (who says they will honor the lifetime warranty) doesn't have parts and is no help...The Kimber coaxial spring fits (with a bit of filing) and appears to work just fine.
That was all good...
The disappointment:
The Sig 1911 that I had bought?
Not so good.
I had cleaned it of the factorygoo lube and lubed it. Swabbed the barrel of same goo. Reassembled... Just hadn't gotten to the range.
Today was the day. Pulled it out of the box....Middle bro was waiting his turn to shoot it.....
Went to load a mag.:
Odd: the cartridges won't go into the mag?
Lets try the other mag:
Same thing? WTF?
Middle bro is looking at me like I am a window licking special needs kid (the ones they make wear a helmet).
I hand him the mag and some .45 ACP.
He can't seem to load 'em either. (he, while he has his moments, isn't stupid...or retarded). Yes, I know some folks find that term offensive....Deal with it.
Hands mag back to me....
I look at base of mag....
odd, it is stamped "9mm".
Well, that might could be the issue....I suppose even Sig can make a mistake.....
He offers me a Wilson Combat 8 rounder for .45 from his pistol.... I load 2 (first time firing). Begin to insert the mag in the magwell....
I stop for a minute and look closely at the barrel.
It too says "9MM".
Strange....I
thought I had purchased a .45.
Paper work (still in box) says .45?
I WAS tempted to shoot it..we had a shitload of 9 there.
But I didn't. Put it away
Got back from the range. Called Gander Mountain where I had ordered it..
They "don't take guns back".
Usually.
Explained the issue.
Surprisingly for a big box corporate store, once they had looked up the order, they asked me to bring the pistol back.
Took a while, 4 managers to do different overrides, but they have now ordered the correct model and it will be here on Wed.
When I bought it, I had checked the serial number to make sure it matched the box and paperwork, but I didn't check the barrel for caliber. I had ordered a .45 and (foolishly) thought that was what had come. My bad, I guess.
Kind of a bummer, but I do have to say that the Gander Mountain staff handled it well. Treated me well. Apologized over and over.
It isn't that you made a mistake, it is how you fix the mistake that counts.
So that was the afternoon
He (nephew) has his maternal grandfathers Remington 511 "ScoreMaster" which I cleaned and lubed when it was given to him about a year ago (the thing hadn't had more than 100 rounds through it, and, aside from petrified gun oil and dust was, actually, in perfect condition) Has a tiny thin 4X scope on it, but in bright sunny conditions that works very well.
We called my other brother and my Dad for a range day. All had fun. 3 generations on a range. This is why we win. There is no equivalent "(Anti) range day" that can compete.
We poked a few holes in paper at 25, then 50, yards, rang the gongs at 50 yards. Then knocked over bowling pins at 50 yards (nephew really likes that).
His dad (my youngest brother) put a few hundred rounds through the Marlin lever action ,22 model 1897. I think I am gonna get him one for Christmas, if I can find one. Or a 39M.
Nephew liked the Savage bolt gun too, but not as much as grandad's rifle.
Of course, everyone likes the Non-Ruger 10-22 in Red/White/Blue. 2 lb trigger, Big 4-10 X 60 scope, What's not to like?
Dad shot his 9mm pistol, and we all shot his recently-found Springfield .22 single shot (no model number that I can find). It has extraction issues, but I am sure I can fix that. Clean, no rust, good trigger. Likely old as shit as there is no serial number that I can find.
I did put 25 rounds through the Para LDA with the new Kimber spring (the original Para spring is, of course, not available, and is now at over twice the recommended round count for replacement...., and Remington (who says they will honor the lifetime warranty) doesn't have parts and is no help...The Kimber coaxial spring fits (with a bit of filing) and appears to work just fine.
That was all good...
The disappointment:
The Sig 1911 that I had bought?
Not so good.
I had cleaned it of the factory
Today was the day. Pulled it out of the box....Middle bro was waiting his turn to shoot it.....
Went to load a mag.:
Odd: the cartridges won't go into the mag?
Lets try the other mag:
Same thing? WTF?
Middle bro is looking at me like I am a window licking special needs kid (the ones they make wear a helmet).
I hand him the mag and some .45 ACP.
He can't seem to load 'em either. (he, while he has his moments, isn't stupid...or retarded). Yes, I know some folks find that term offensive....Deal with it.
Hands mag back to me....
I look at base of mag....
odd, it is stamped "9mm".
Well, that might could be the issue....I suppose even Sig can make a mistake.....
He offers me a Wilson Combat 8 rounder for .45 from his pistol.... I load 2 (first time firing). Begin to insert the mag in the magwell....
I stop for a minute and look closely at the barrel.
It too says "9MM".
Strange....I
thought I had purchased a .45.
Paper work (still in box) says .45?
I WAS tempted to shoot it..we had a shitload of 9 there.
But I didn't. Put it away
Got back from the range. Called Gander Mountain where I had ordered it..
They "don't take guns back".
Usually.
Explained the issue.
Surprisingly for a big box corporate store, once they had looked up the order, they asked me to bring the pistol back.
Took a while, 4 managers to do different overrides, but they have now ordered the correct model and it will be here on Wed.
When I bought it, I had checked the serial number to make sure it matched the box and paperwork, but I didn't check the barrel for caliber. I had ordered a .45 and (foolishly) thought that was what had come. My bad, I guess.
Kind of a bummer, but I do have to say that the Gander Mountain staff handled it well. Treated me well. Apologized over and over.
It isn't that you made a mistake, it is how you fix the mistake that counts.
So that was the afternoon
Liar,Liar
How does he sit there with his pants on fire?
"I would sue any President that exceeds his or her powers."
What a lying sack of excrement.
Were that the case, Barry and he would be in court right now. Would have been from about the 4th month of the first terms of Barry the Magnificent (gun) salesman.
But I must have missed the court cases. Perhaps the Media isn't reporting them....
"I would sue any President that exceeds his or her powers."
What a lying sack of excrement.
Were that the case, Barry and he would be in court right now. Would have been from about the 4th month of the first terms of Barry the Magnificent (gun) salesman.
But I must have missed the court cases. Perhaps the Media isn't reporting them....
Friday, June 17, 2016
How long
Until Cheaper than Dirt (no link from me, I won''t ever link to them nor buy from them again) jacks the pricing on ammo and mags through the roof again once the panic hits. Do you remember $89 PMags? .
I remember. And you should too.
I remember. And you should too.
A thought:
Since these attacks nearly always have a "Muslim" theme to the, yet they are all "Isolated Incidents" according to Authorities. (whose authority, BTW?) .....
Then why are all gun owners attacked and out Second amendment at risk by the Gun Grabbers? They are, after all, "Isolated incidents", right? Just deranged individuals. Not because of religion, not because of guns. Just "isolated incidents".
'Cause we can blame the religion just like they blame the guns....
So does this mean we get to restrict Muslims? Perhaps set a curfew? Allow them to be searched at any time? Subject to special licensing? Muslim Permits? Limits on how many children they can have? How many muslims can be in a house at one time without proper storage? Mandatory child locks on teachings?
Yust a thought
Then why are all gun owners attacked and out Second amendment at risk by the Gun Grabbers? They are, after all, "Isolated incidents", right? Just deranged individuals. Not because of religion, not because of guns. Just "isolated incidents".
'Cause we can blame the religion just like they blame the guns....
So does this mean we get to restrict Muslims? Perhaps set a curfew? Allow them to be searched at any time? Subject to special licensing? Muslim Permits? Limits on how many children they can have? How many muslims can be in a house at one time without proper storage? Mandatory child locks on teachings?
Yust a thought
Gotcha!
So I am in for my annual physical:
Which includes "The Finger".
The doc does the deed, and then I look over my shoulder and said "Don't waste your breath telling me about self examinations, Doc....Ain't gonna happen".
He laughed...Hard.
I am apparently good for another year or 34,000 miles, whichever comes first....
Which includes "The Finger".
The doc does the deed, and then I look over my shoulder and said "Don't waste your breath telling me about self examinations, Doc....Ain't gonna happen".
He laughed...Hard.
I am apparently good for another year or 34,000 miles, whichever comes first....
Thursday, June 16, 2016
And the GOP wanted us to vote for him for president?
John McCain, No friend of gun owners
And the GOP wonders why I won't give them any money or support.
And the GOP wonders why I won't give them any money or support.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)