Based on GENDER,,,,are, apparently, OK, as long as the recipients are the RIGHT gender.
"I believe we have now reached a crossroads where it is imperative that a woman-led board acquire control of the company and create content that continues to inspire audiences around the world, especially our young girls and boys," Contreras-Sweet said in the letter.
So it is OK to state that the "New" company will have a woman led board of directors, the majority of which MUST be women.
Isn't that discrimination by gender? If discrimination is bad, then it is bad. Reverse discrimination is still discrimination. And announcing that one plans to discriminate would seem to me to be a conspiracy to do so....
How about folks who are neither "standard" or "Biological" gender???? Will there be an appropriate number of trans individuals on the board??
"I believe we have now reached a crossroads where it is imperative that a woman-led board acquire control of the company and create content that continues to inspire audiences around the world, especially our young girls and boys," Contreras-Sweet said in the letter.
So it is OK to state that the "New" company will have a woman led board of directors, the majority of which MUST be women.
Isn't that discrimination by gender? If discrimination is bad, then it is bad. Reverse discrimination is still discrimination. And announcing that one plans to discriminate would seem to me to be a conspiracy to do so....
How about folks who are neither "standard" or "Biological" gender???? Will there be an appropriate number of trans individuals on the board??
They STILL don't get it... sigh
ReplyDelete